Valovi ob obali
In this article
  1. Six years: how long couples wait on average
  2. Dark glasses: what happens when resentment outruns help
  3. Early signs couples are most likely to overlook
  4. Couples therapy is not only for couples in crisis
  5. "If we go to therapy, we're finished" — let us turn that sentence around
  6. When it is no longer a question of "whether" but of "when"
  7. What actually happens in couples therapy
  8. "I would go, but he won't" — the most common complication
  9. A simple test to finish with

Nothing dramatic is happening. Nobody is shouting, nobody is leaving. It is just that the evenings have grown quieter, the conversations shorter, and the same argument — the one about money, about his mother, about who does more — keeps coming back in exactly the same loop, as if it had its own timetable. Perhaps you are asking yourself: is this already a reason for couples therapy? Or are we still “not far enough apart” to go?

I hear that question often — and almost always too late. Most couples look for help only when the relationship is already deeply worn, not when the way back would be shortest. In this piece I show you how to recognise that it is time for a conversation with a third person present: which early signs matter more than loud crises, why couples therapy is not reserved for couples on the brink of breaking up, and when help is genuinely urgent.

Above all, I want to turn one quiet belief on its head: that deciding on therapy is an admission of defeat. In reality it is often the exact opposite — the first serious sign that you both still care a great deal about the relationship.

Six years: how long couples wait on average

John Gottman, one of the most influential researchers of couple relationships, estimates on the basis of his many years of observing couples that from the appearance of the first serious difficulties to the moment they seek help, couples wait on average around six years. Six years. That means six years of repeating the same arguments, six years of resentment slowly accumulating, six years in which a misunderstanding turns from an episode into a pattern, and the pattern into the identity of the relationship: “that’s just how we are”.

Why so long? Because a relationship does not break overnight. Drifting apart is gradual and each individual step seems too small to “go to a therapist” over. One unheard call for help, one topic you would rather go around, one evening when each of you looks at their own screen — none of this is an alarm. The alarm is only the sum. But by the time the sum becomes unbearable, both of you are already tired, defensive and full of evidence against each other.

Research on the effectiveness of couples therapy is both clear and sober here: couples therapy helps most couples who choose it — review studies (Lebow et al., 2012) show significant improvements in roughly two thirds of couples. But the effect is generally greater when a couple comes earlier: fewer accumulated resentments means more goodwill to work with. Therapy is not the rebuilding of a ruin — it is easier to repair the roof while the house is still standing.

Dark glasses: what happens when resentment outruns help

Why is waiting so expensive? Because over years of unresolved resentment a quiet but fateful switch occurs, which the researcher Robert Weiss named negative sentiment override. As long as a relationship is in good shape, we read a partner’s clumsy actions charitably: a forgotten phone call means “he had a mad day”. But once enough resentment has built up, the glasses turn — we start reading the same actions through dark glass. A forgotten call becomes “he doesn’t care about me”, a neutral comment becomes a dig, even a kind gesture becomes “he wants something from me”.

This is the point at which a relationship starts turning against itself: nothing the partner does can really count any more, because the filter is stronger than the actions. And this is also why therapy after long years of waiting is harder — first the glasses have to come off, and only then can you work on the content. A couple who come earlier do not have this detour; their goodwill still reads charitably, and every change bears fruit at once.

If you catch yourself automatically reading your partner’s actions in the worst light for some time now — and even being irritated by their kindnesses — that is one of the most reliable signs that it is time for help. Not because you are a bad person, but because your glasses are covered in dust you can no longer wipe off yourself.

Early signs couples are most likely to overlook

So how do you recognise that it is time, before the sum grows too large? In my work with couples I notice that it is the quiet signs that speak loudest — the ones that do not look like a problem from the outside:

  • The same argument circles. You do not argue about a hundred things but about three — always the same ones, always following the same script, always with the same ending. The content may be trivial, but the fact that the argument never moves says that something you have not yet touched lies beneath it. I have written in more detail about what hides beneath the surface of recurring arguments in the piece It’s Not About the Washing-Up.
  • Taboo topics. There are questions you no longer open — children, money, intimacy, his or her family — because “it isn’t worth it” or “we always end up fighting”. Every topic that becomes a minefield shrinks the space of the relationship.
  • More logistics than contact. Conversations still happen, but only about schedules, shopping, children and obligations. The relationship works like a well-run company — and that is exactly the problem: you are colleagues, and less and less partners.
  • Intimacy fades. Not only sex — also touch in passing, a kiss on leaving, a hug for no reason. When physical closeness disappears, it usually does not disappear first; it is a consequence of an emotional distance that formed earlier.
  • One of you withdraws. One partner closes off more and more often — into work, the phone, silence. From the outside the withdrawal looks like peace, but it is often a sign of being overwhelmed or of resignation: “there’s no point any more”.

None of these signs on its own means the relationship is in crisis. But if you recognise several of them and they have lasted months, that is roughly the moment when a conversation with a therapist would bring the most — because there is still enough that is worth protecting.

Couples therapy is not only for couples in crisis

One of the most stubborn ideas about couples therapy is that it is the last stop before divorce. In reality it is often most useful when the relationship is not yet in flames.

Couples also come preventively: because they know a period is coming that will put the relationship under strain — the birth of a child, a house move, a new job, illness in the family, children leaving home. Every major life transition reshuffles roles and expectations, and couples who talk about it beforehand generally come through the transition considerably more calmly. I write about how parenthood shifts the foundations of a relationship in the piece on parenthood as a transition, and about the relationship after the children leave in the piece on the empty nest.

Another common reason is not crisis but growth: the partners are each developing in their own direction and the relationship has not yet caught up. That is not necessarily a bad sign — but it is a crossroads at which it is worth having someone who helps make sure that growth does not turn into drifting apart. If you recognise yourself in this, I recommend the piece When a Partner Grows Elsewhere.

Couples therapy, then, is less like an emergency department and more like a regular service: you do not come because the engine has already failed, but because you hear a sound that was not there before.

A couple sitting on a bench, each turned in a different direction
Drifting apart rarely looks like an argument. Most often it looks like a silence both people have grown used to.

“If we go to therapy, we’re finished” — let us turn that sentence around

I hear this fear from almost every couple who call for the first time: that deciding on therapy is proof that the relationship is dying. That “normal couples” do not need it. That the therapist will rule on who is right, or — worse — conclude that there is no solution.

Let us look at this fear up close. What does the decision to go to therapy actually say? That you are both willing to give time, money and a fair amount of courage to something you could simply leave to fall apart. That is not a sign of an ending — it is one of the clearest acts of commitment a couple can make. The end does not usually happen in therapy; it happens in the years of silence before it, when nobody is trying any more.

Something else is true, though: therapy changes a relationship. It opens topics that were closed, and that can be unpleasant at first — more on why the process first exposes and only then heals in the piece Why Therapy Hurts First. But the alternative is not peace; the alternative is a slow freeze. And a frozen relationship sooner or later breaks by itself, without a therapist.

When it is no longer a question of “whether” but of “when”

There are, though, signs where delaying is no longer wisdom but risk. The first is contempt: eye-rolling, sarcasm, humiliation, speaking about your partner as an inferior. Gottman’s longitudinal research identified contempt as the single strongest predictor of a relationship breaking down — stronger than the frequency of arguments or how loud they are. If contempt has settled into your arguments, do not wait; I write about why it is so destructive and how it is dismantled in the piece on the four horsemen of relationships.

The second is an affair, a major broken trust or serious secrets — wounds a couple rarely works through to the end without help, because the conversation about them either explodes too quickly or dies away too quickly.

And the third, which I must address with particular care: violence. If there is physical violence, intimidation or systematic humiliation in the relationship, so that you are afraid to tell the truth, couples therapy is not the right form of help. Joint sessions assume that both people can speak safely and openly — which cannot be guaranteed where there is violence, and openness in a session could mean danger at home. Where there is violence, the professional literature (for example Stith et al.) therefore recommends a separate, individual route of help for each partner. If you recognise yourself in this paragraph, the first step is an individual conversation — with me or with any support service — where you can say what is happening without fear.

What actually happens in couples therapy

It may help if I open the door of the therapy room a little further. In couples therapy you are not sitting in front of a judge. The therapist is not an arbiter who will name the guilty party — their client is the relationship, not one of you. As a therapist in training in marriage and family therapy, under supervision, this is exactly what I do: I watch your dance — who takes which step, what sets off what — and, together with you, slow it down enough for you to see it properly for the first time.

Sessions are conversations in which an argument is allowed to happen, but it goes differently from at home: more slowly, with translation and without escalation. How exactly we hold the frame safe even when feelings boil over I have described in the piece on the safe argument in couples therapy. The first session is mainly about getting acquainted — each of you tells your own picture of the relationship and together we set goals. Then we work on two tracks at once: on the patterns (how you talk to each other, where the dance gets stuck, what triggers whom) and on the content (topics that have waited years for a safe space). Some couples need a few sessions, others a longer process — depending above all on how long the patterns have had to become entrenched.

I offer couples therapy as part of my practice in Ljubljana; you can read more about it and about my other forms of work on the Services page. And because couples often also wonder what a first visit is like and how long the process takes, I have given each of those questions a separate piece — on the first session and on how long therapy takes.

“I would go, but he won’t” — the most common complication

Very often only one person is ready. That is no reason for nothing to happen. First, the way you invite your partner counts enormously: an invitation “for myself and for us” works quite differently from an ultimatum. And second — even if your partner does not (yet) come, one person can work on the relationship, because a change in one always shifts the dance of both. I have given this a whole piece: When Only One Partner Wants Therapy.

So if you are nodding along as you read this piece but know that your partner will be sceptical: start with yourself. Even a single introductory conversation can clarify what is happening in the relationship and which route makes sense.

A simple test to finish with

Instead of a conclusion, I leave you three questions. Answer them honestly, for yourself:

  • Can we still talk about important things without the conversation ending in an argument or a withdrawal?
  • Do I still feel seen and heard with my partner — at least most of the time?
  • Do I imagine our relationship five years from now with gladness or with anxiety?

If the answers sting, that is not a verdict on the relationship. It is information — the same kind as a noise in an engine: it does not mean the journey is over, it means it is time to look under the bonnet. And better now, at the beginning of those six years, than at the end of them. If you would like to check whether couples therapy makes sense for the two of you, you can write to me without obligation via the Contact page.

A couple's path to help — on average about 6 yearsFirst cracksthe same row circles,first taboo topicsAdapting"that's just how we are",topics get avoidedDrifting apartlogistics, no contact,intimacy fades, retreatCrisisresentment, contempt,"there's no point"Help is easiest and fastest heregoodwill still there, little resentmentThis is when most couples calltherapy still helps, but the road is longerThe key messageCouples therapy is not the last stop before the end — it gives the mostwhile there is still enough that is worth protecting.

Sources
  1. Gottman, J. M. & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Crown. gottman.com
  2. Gottman, J. M. & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family. doi.org
  3. Lebow, J. L., Chambers, A. L., Christensen, A. & Johnson, S. M. (2012). Research on the treatment of couple distress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. PubMed
  4. Doss, B. D., Simpson, L. E. & Christensen, A. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. doi.org
  5. Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E. & Rosen, K. H. (2011). Couples Therapy for Domestic Violence: Finding Safe Solutions. American Psychological Association. doi.org
  6. Johnson, S. M., Hunsley, J., Greenberg, L. & Schindler, D. (1999). Emotionally focused couples therapy: Status and challenges. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. doi.org
Veronika Železnik

About the author

Veronika Železnik

Sem stažistka iz zakonske in družinske terapije pod supervizijo in diplomirana dramska igralka (AGRFT). Leta na odru so me naučila pozorno opazovati ljudi, izkušnja s kronično nespečnostjo pa me je pripeljala v terapijo in do odločitve, da človeka ne raziskujem skozi vloge, ampak v živem odnosu. Verjamem, da se sprememba zgodi v varnem in spoštljivem odnosu — o tem pišem tukaj. Več najdeš na strani My Approach.

Contact

Six years is too long.

If you recognise yourselves in the signs in this post, don't wait for them to become a crisis — one introductory conversation can clarify what is happening in your relationship.

Write to me