Reka in gore za obrežnim rastjem
Reka in gore za obrežnim rastjem
In this article
  1. It isn’t the mistake that hurts, but what it says about you
  2. Why the body takes a mistake so seriously
  3. Rumination: when a thought circles instead of going somewhere
  4. The workplace as a family: how a system handles mistakes
  5. Where such a sensitive ear comes from
  6. What helps: fix the mistake, not yourself
  7. Exercise: three lines after a mistake
  8. Where this doesn’t apply
  9. What therapy has to say about it
  10. What to remember

“It was fixed within an hour. But I’m still thinking about it today.”

It was a Monday morning. He had sent a client the proposal he had worked on all week — with the wrong attachment, an older version containing a price that no longer applied. The client rang his manager, his manager rang him. The conversation lasted three minutes, it wasn’t harsh, and the mistake was corrected before lunch. And yet: that night he couldn’t sleep. The next day he checked every message four times before sending it. When his manager closed her office door, he was convinced she was talking about him. A month later the scene still comes back to him in the shower, in the car, in the middle of a conversation with his partner.

If this sounds familiar, you are not alone. A single mistake — often a small one, quickly corrected, already forgotten by everyone else — can live inside a person for weeks. Not because it was so serious, but because it set off something deeper than the mistake itself. In this post I would like to look at what that is, why it bites so hard and what can be done about it.

It isn’t the mistake that hurts, but what it says about you

When we make a mistake, two very different emotions can speak up in us. The American psychologist June Tangney, who spent decades researching the difference between them, describes it like this: guilt says “I did something bad”, while shame says “I am bad”. Guilt centres on the action. Shame centres on the whole person.

The difference sounds like wordplay, but it has very concrete consequences. Research by Tangney and her colleagues shows that guilt generally drives people towards repair: they apologise, try to limit the damage, learn something from the mistake. Shame drives them in the opposite direction — towards hiding, withdrawing, avoiding, and sometimes towards anger and blaming others, because the feeling of being “bad” is so unbearable that it has to be redirected somewhere. I wrote about this difference in more detail in Guilt and shame are not the same — and the difference matters.

So when one mistake eats up a whole month, it is very likely no longer about guilt over the wrong attachment. It is about shame, which read the mistake as an exposure: now they see what I am really like.

The same mistake, two pathsBased on June Tangney’s research: guilt looks at the action, shame looks at the whole person.MistakeGuiltThe sentence in your head“I made a mistake.”Where it looksat the action and its effectsWhat it drives you to dofix it, apologise,learn somethingHow long it lastsuntil it is put rightShameThe sentence in your head“I am incompetent.”Where it looksat the whole person and othersWhat it drives you to dohide, withdraw,sometimes blame othersHow long it lastsweeks, as there is nothing to fixthe same event,a different storyabout who you are

Why the body takes a mistake so seriously

Shame is not just a thought. It is a powerful bodily response — heat in the face, a knot in the stomach, the wish to disappear. In 2004 the researchers Sally Dickerson and Margaret Kemeny reviewed 208 laboratory studies on what most strongly triggers the stress hormone cortisol in people. The strongest response came from tasks in which people were being evaluated by others and could not control the outcome. With such tasks, cortisol also took the longest to return to its baseline.

That tells us something important. For our body, the threat of being seen as incompetent by others is no small matter. It is a threat of being pushed out of the group — and in our evolutionary history, exclusion from the group was dangerous. That is why a mistake others see hurts differently from one nobody sees. And that is why the body keeps working on it for longer than the consequences would justify.

A mistake at work is almost always public. Your manager sees it, your colleagues, the client. It isn’t only that a task was done badly; it’s that everyone saw. And this is where shame finds its most fertile ground.

Rumination: when a thought circles instead of going somewhere

The second reason one mistake eats up a whole month is rumination — going over the same thoughts without getting anywhere. “Why didn’t I check? How could I be so stupid? What do they think now? What if it happens again?” The thoughts feel like thinking, as if you were solving something. In reality they go round in circles.

The psychologist Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, who researched rumination for most of her career, showed with her colleagues that this kind of circling prolongs and deepens a low mood while weakening the ability to solve problems. A person who ruminates feels they are dealing with the mistake responsibly — but in fact they are dealing with it in a way that leads nowhere. I wrote more about why the brain does this at all in Rumination: the scientific name for spinning thoughts.

Shame and rumination feed each other. Shame supplies the theme (“I am incompetent”), and rumination makes sure the theme keeps coming back. Because shame isn’t about an action you could put right but about you, rumination never finds an end. You fixed the mistake in an hour. You can’t “fix” yourself — so the thought keeps circling.

The workplace as a family: how a system handles mistakes

In relational family therapy, the approach I am training in, we always see the individual as part of a system. The workplace is no exception. It has its roles, its unwritten rules, its coalitions — and it also has its own attitude to mistakes, which nobody learns from the rulebook but from what happens when someone gets something wrong.

Some teams treat a mistake as information: what happened, where the system gave way, how we stop it happening again. Others treat it as an individual’s fault: who is to blame and how we will reprimand them. Amy Edmondson of Harvard found something surprising in a study of hospital units: units with better leadership and a more open climate reported more errors, not fewer. Not because they made more mistakes, but because they dared to admit them. Where mistakes are feared, they don’t happen less often — they are simply hidden.

In a team where mistakes are punished by shaming, even a very healthy person will experience a mistake as an exposure. In a team where mistakes are discussed calmly, shame has less room. That is neither your merit nor your fault — it is a property of the system you work in. If you work under a manager who leads through intimidation, you may find The boss who leads through fear: what happens to your nervous system every day helpful.

A triangle readily joins the system, too. The colleague who spotted the mistake doesn’t talk to you about it but to a third person. Gossip travels faster than the correction. And you start reading every passing glance as a verdict.

Where such a sensitive ear comes from

We don’t all respond to mistakes in the same way. Faced with the same wrong attachment, one person will shrug, another will sleep badly for a month. The difference often lies not in how “serious” or “conscientious” someone is, but in what a mistake meant in the family they grew up in.

In some families a mistake was a chance to learn. In others it meant the atmosphere at home changed for the whole evening: silence at dinner, a disappointed look, a comparison with a brother. A child who grows up like that learns that a mistake is not just a mistake — it is proof that they are not good enough, and it is dangerous for the relationship with the people they depend on. Some children take on the role of “the one who never gets it wrong” — the good, reliable one who keeps the peace at home. Adults in this role are often exceptionally good at work. And exceptionally vulnerable when they make a mistake.

The voice that tells you after a mistake “how could you be so stupid” is often the internalised voice of someone from back then. I wrote about where it comes from and how to work with it in The inner critic: where the voice that constantly judges you comes from.

When the system at work repeats a pattern from childhood — a manager who goes silent like a father, a team that watches like a family —, the old emotion arrives at full strength. Then you are not only responding to a wrong attachment. You are responding to every mistake that ever cost you closeness.

What helps: fix the mistake, not yourself

Shame has one weakness: it can’t stand words. As long as it stays hidden, it grows. Once you name it, it shrinks. So the first step is often very simple — separating the mistake from yourself.

  • Fix what can be fixed. Here guilt is your ally: say what happened, what you did to put it right and what you will change. Then that part is closed.
  • Name shame when you notice it. “This is no longer thinking about the mistake, this is shame.” That sentence alone creates a small gap between you and the emotion.
  • Talk to someone you trust. Shame softens most through the experience of someone seeing you — mistake and all — and staying. You don’t need reassurance that the mistake “was nothing”; you need someone who knows about it and hasn’t written you off.
  • Answer your inner critic with compassion, not evidence. Juliana Breines and Serena Chen showed that people who thought about a mistake or weakness with self-compassion did not become more complacent, but more motivated to improve and to make amends. Being kind to yourself is not letting yourself off — it is the condition for learning anything from a mistake at all.

Below is a dialogue showing how a conversation in which shame begins to soften can sound (composite, not a real person):

“I know it was fixed. Still. Everyone saw how I messed up.”
“What do you think they saw?”
“That I’m not as good as they thought.”
“Did anyone say that?”
“No. My manager just said to check the attachment next time.”
“So she saw a wrong attachment. Who saw an incompetent person?”
“… I did.”

In that short moment the heart of it shows: the external consequence was small and finished. The internal verdict was large and carried on. That verdict did not come from the manager.

Exercise: three lines after a mistake

You can do this exercise today if a mistake — new or old — keeps going round in your head. You need a sheet of paper and ten minutes. It is similar to the exercise Two columns for the inner critic in the knowledge base, only adapted to a mistake at work.

  1. Write the mistake in one sentence, as you would in a report. No adjectives about yourself. “On Monday I sent the client the wrong version of the proposal.”
  2. Write what you did to put it right and what you will change. “I corrected it within an hour. I will open the attachment before sending.” If anything is still open, write one step you will take tomorrow.
  3. Write the sentence shame is saying. “I’m incompetent. Now everyone knows.” Write it exactly as you hear it.
  4. Read the first two lines and then the third. Ask yourself: does the third follow from the first two? Would you reach the same conclusion about a colleague who did the same thing?
  5. Set a time for reflection. If the thought comes back, tell yourself: “I’ll think about this tomorrow at five, for ten minutes.” When the time comes, read the sheet. When the ten minutes are up, put it away. That way you give rumination limits instead of giving it the whole day.

The exercise won’t erase shame in one evening. But it will do something important: it will return the mistake to its true size.

How one mistake eats a monthThe same mistake on two paths: above, shame and rumination; below, repair and a conversation.day 0first nightweeks 1–2after a monthmistakethe scene replays,sleep is poorchecking, withdrawing,reading every glance“I’m not good enough.”the mistake becomes identityday 0same dayfirst weekafter a monthmistakea correction and onesentence about changea talk with someoneyou trustthe mistake is a memory,not a verdict

Where this doesn’t apply

I want to be honest about the limits of everything I have written.

Some mistakes really do call for more than a correction. If your mistake caused someone serious harm, it is normal for it to weigh on you for longer and more heavily. Guilt in that case is not the enemy but a sign that you care. The aim is not to get rid of it quickly, but to turn it into responsibility — an apology, making good the damage, change — and to keep it from sliding into shame that will only paralyse you. How to tell one from the other is the subject of Healthy guilt and toxic guilt: how to tell them apart.

Sometimes the problem isn’t your sensitivity but the environment. If your manager humiliates you in front of others for every mistake, if mistakes are talked about as flaws of character, if you have become the one everything that goes wrong is pinned on, then self-compassion won’t be enough. Then the question is what is happening in the system and whether you want to stay in it. If you suspect workplace bullying, you can seek advice from a trade union or from legal aid; I can’t give legal advice here.

When shame lasts for weeks and spreads — you sleep badly, don’t eat, can’t concentrate, thoughts about the mistake take up most of the day, you lose pleasure in things that used to bring it —, it is no longer just a response to one event. It may be a sign of depression or anxiety. Then turn to your GP, who can advise you on further help. If thoughts of not wanting to live appear, in Slovenia you can call the crisis line Klic v duševni stiski on 01 520 99 00 (every day from 7 pm to 7 am) or the Samaritans helpline on 116 123 (24 hours a day), and in an emergency 112.

And rumination is not the same as conscientiousness. Many people fear that if they stop going over a mistake, they will become careless. Research suggests the opposite — rumination worsens judgement rather than improving it. You can be very careful and still stop punishing yourself.

A forest edge under a clear blue sky
You fixed the mistake within an hour. You don't need fixing.

What therapy has to say about it

When a mistake at work digs in so deeply that it eats up a whole month, it is often a door to something older. In therapy, then, we don’t stop at the wrong attachment; we look at what a mistake used to mean, whom you had to please, what happened when you got something wrong as a child. Once that becomes visible, the present mistake loses part of its weight — because you are no longer responding to every mistake at once, only to this one.

Sometimes the experience of telling someone about your mistake and seeing them not recoil is enough. For someone who grew up in a family where a mistake meant distance, this may be the first such experience in their life. And that kind of experience dissolves shame more than even the best advice. I also work with English-speaking clients, in person in Ljubljana. If you also recognise yourself in constant checking and dread of the next mistake, you may relate to Perfectionism and overthinking: two sides of the same fear, and if shame brings you to tears, to Crying at work: why we fear it so much and what it really means.

What to remember

  • Guilt says “I made a mistake” and drives you to repair; shame says “I am a mistake” and drives you to hide.
  • A mistake in front of others triggers a strong bodily stress response, because the body takes being judged by others as a serious threat.
  • Rumination feels like responsible thinking, but in reality it prolongs low mood and weakens judgement.
  • How long a mistake weighs on you also depends on the system: on how your team handles mistakes, and on what a mistake meant in your family.
  • Fix the mistake, not yourself — and tell someone who stays about it.
Sources
  1. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford Press.
  2. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. PubMed
  3. Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391. PubMed
  4. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424. PubMed
  5. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5–28.
  6. Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1133–1143. PubMed
  7. Gostečnik, C. (2017). Relational Family Therapy: The Systemic, Interpersonal, and Intrapsychic Experience. New York: Routledge.
Veronika Železnik

About the author

Veronika Železnik

Sem stažistka iz zakonske in družinske terapije pod supervizijo in diplomirana dramska igralka (AGRFT). Leta na odru so me naučila pozorno opazovati ljudi, izkušnja s kronično nespečnostjo pa me je pripeljala v terapijo in do odločitve, da človeka ne raziskujem skozi vloge, ampak v živem odnosu. Verjamem, da se sprememba zgodi v varnem in spoštljivem odnosu — o tem pišem tukaj. Več najdeš na strani My Approach.

Contact

Is one mistake still following you around?

If mistakes at work keep coming back for weeks and you hear an old voice in them, write to me. Together we can look at where it comes from and how to quieten it.

Write to me